The NCAA Tournament is easily one of the most exciting events in sports. 64 teams (I don't count the play-in games) facing against each other for one common prize. The stakes can't get any higher. If you lose, your season is over. This makes for very interesting match-ups, fun to watch upsets, and a ton of very close games. It doesn't seem like it could get much better; but is it perfect?I don't think so. In fact, I believe there is one huge thing that it is missing, and all it has to do to figure it out is look at it's little brother, The NIT. What does the NIT have that the NCAA Tournament doesn't?
Student and local fan involvement.
Now don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that the atmosphere for NCAA Tournament games isn't good. It's great! but it's missing something that it just can't get with the current system they have in place. The average college student and local fan can not afford to travel halfway across the country, and pay $200 for a ticket to watch their team play one or two basketball games. It simply is not feasible.
The NIT however has avoided this problem by simply playings games and giving a team home court. For example, In the first round of the NIT there was a game between Boston College and my hometown university, McNeese State. Where did they play the game? They played in the Burton Coliseum in Lake Charles, Louisiana, because that is where McNeese plays its home games. Not a hard concept to follow.
Now I know some of you are thinking "Who wants to watch Boston College vs. McNeese State in a small town like Lake Charles." McNeese Fans! The Burton Coliseum was absolutely packed, full of people who wanted to watch their small town Cowboys take on a power conference team like Boston College.
Above I have posted a picture comparing the crowds at the Pepsi Center in Denver, Colorado for the Louisville vs. Morehead State game, one of the most exciting games of the tournament thus far, and The Burton Coliseum for MSU vs BC. The reason for this mass difference in attendance is obvious. There is very little interest for both Louisville and Morehead State, two teams located in Kentucky, in Denver, Colorado. Imagine if that game was held at one of the competing team's universities. They are 2 hours away from each other. It would have been absolute madness.
Now, I do understand where the NCAA is coming from. They want everything to be as "fair" and "equal" as possible by putting all of these games at a neutral site. That said, think of how much money they would make and save if they just had at least the first 2 rounds played at a participating school's gym. This would essentially assure sold out crowds, and bring the true atmosphere of college basketball into the tournament. Isn't that the only thing that it's missing?
I honestly feel that the NCAA Tournament is the best, most exciting and fun to watch playoff system in sports, but as we all know, everything can get better. Whether it's by expanding the bracket or giving teams home court advantage, we may never know. I do know, however, that nothing is perfect and everything can be improved upon.
If you have any comments, questions, or ideas of how to make the NCAA Tournament better, or if there is something you want to me to write about specifically, post a comment. I promise I read them and I will be glad to service you in any way that I can.